The latest CBSA removals from Canada include 111 foreign nationals linked to cases involving extortion, organized criminal activity and other grounds of inadmissibility. The agency issued 188 removal orders as of September 3, 2026, as part of a wider enforcement effort involving law enforcement partners across Canada.
The Canada Border Services Agency says its current enforcement work focuses on foreign nationals who may be inadmissible under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The agency is also currently removing approximately 400 inadmissible individuals each week across Canada.
For temporary residents, permanent residents and people involved in immigration proceedings, the update highlights the importance of complying with Canadian immigration and criminal laws.
What Happened in the Latest CBSA Enforcement Update?
The CBSA announced on September 14, 2026, that 111 individuals had been removed in connection with enforcement efforts targeting foreign nationals linked to extortion-related activity.
The cases were spread across three regions:
| Region | Removal orders | Individuals removed |
| Pacific | 91 | 58 |
| Prairie | 47 | 30 |
| Greater Toronto Area | 50 | 23 |
| Total | 188 | 111 |
The figures are based on CBSA information available as of September 3, 2026.
The agency began dedicating resources to potential extortion-related cases in the Pacific and Prairie regions in August 2025. The initiative expanded to the Greater Toronto Area in November 2025.
Why Is CBSA Focusing on Criminal Inadmissibility?
Canadian immigration law contains rules that can make a foreign national inadmissible to Canada for certain forms of criminality, organized crime or other grounds.
The CBSA investigates foreign nationals who may have violated IRPA. Its investigations can draw on information from police and other law enforcement agencies, government partners, CBSA investigations and public reports.
The latest cases therefore should not be interpreted as a general immigration enforcement action against all temporary residents or immigrants.
The CBSA specifically says it gives high priority to enforcement and removal cases involving criminality, organized crime and individuals who pose risks to public safety.
Four Cases Highlighted by the CBSA
The September 14 release identified four recent cases.
Palwinder Singh
The CBSA said Singh was linked to an extortion-related shooting in 2025. The Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada found him inadmissible under IRPA for membership in a criminal organization linked to extortion-related violence. He was subsequently removed.
Jasmer Singh
The agency reported that Jasmer Singh had been convicted in Canada of forcible confinement. He was found inadmissible for serious criminality, issued a deportation order and removed from Canada.
Amitoz Bajwa
The CBSA said Bajwa was found inadmissible after the Immigration and Refugee Board determined that he was a member of an organization engaged in a pattern of criminal activity. The agency also linked the case to firearms-related activity and an extortion-related shooting.
Sahibjot Singh
The CBSA said Sahibjot Singh was found inadmissible for membership in an organization engaged in a pattern of criminal activity. According to the agency, he acknowledged committing offences forming part of that pattern before being removed.
These are individual enforcement cases. They should not be treated as representative of the circumstances of other immigrants or temporary residents.
What Does This Mean for People in Canada?
For people who have lawful status in Canada and comply with Canadian laws, the announcement does not create a new general removal requirement.
The key issue is admissibility.
Foreign nationals can be subject to immigration consequences if they become inadmissible under Canadian law. Criminality is one area that can affect immigration status and future applications.
This is especially relevant to people applying for:
- Canadian permanent residence
- Work permits
- Study permits
- Family sponsorship
- Temporary resident status
- Other Canadian immigration pathways
Applicants should provide accurate information about their immigration and criminal history where required.
Trying to hide relevant information can create additional immigration problems.
Removal Orders Are Not the Same as Immediate Removal
A useful distinction for readers is the difference between a removal order and an actual removal from Canada.
The CBSA reported 188 removal orders and 111 completed removals in the extortion-related enforcement effort as of September 3.
The two figures are therefore not interchangeable.
Canadian immigration enforcement involves legal processes, and people subject to removal orders may have access to applicable review or appeal mechanisms depending on their circumstances.
The CBSA has also stated in other official guidance that people ordered removed are entitled to due process before the law and that removal generally follows the exhaustion of applicable legal avenues.
CBSA Is Removing About 400 Inadmissible People Each Week
The extortion-related enforcement initiative is part of a much larger removal operation.
According to the CBSA, the agency removed 23,160 inadmissible persons in 2025, including 1,010 cases involving serious inadmissibility for serious criminality, national security, war crimes or human rights violations, organized crime and criminality.
The agency currently reports approximately 400 removals of inadmissible individuals every week.
The government has also allocated $30.4 million through Canada’s Border Plan to strengthen CBSA capacity to complete 20,000 removals annually in the relevant fiscal years. Budget 2025 and the Border Plan also provide for the hiring of 1,000 additional CBSA officers.
What Should Immigration Applicants Do?
The latest enforcement figures provide several practical reminders for people considering Canada immigration.
- Be accurate on immigration applications: Applicants should provide complete and truthful information when asked about criminal history, immigration history and other relevant matters.
- Check admissibility early: A criminal record does not necessarily produce the same immigration outcome in every case. The nature of the offence, when it occurred, the sentence and other legal factors can matter. People with criminal records should consider assessing potential inadmissibility before submitting an application.
- Do not ignore immigration correspondence: Anyone who receives a CBSA notice, removal order or other immigration enforcement document should review it promptly. Deadlines can matter.
- Obtain case-specific advice: Immigration enforcement cases can involve complicated interactions between criminal law, immigration legislation and procedural rights. A general online article cannot determine an individual’s admissibility.
What Does the Update Mean for Permanent Residence Applicants?
For people pursuing Canadian permanent residence, admissibility is one part of the overall immigration process.
Meeting program requirements is not necessarily enough. Applicants must also meet applicable admissibility requirements.
This makes criminal history an important consideration for some applicants, particularly those who have convictions or other circumstances that could raise concerns under IRPA.
Applicants should not assume that a previous conviction automatically means permanent residence is impossible. Equally, they should not assume that it will have no effect.
The appropriate assessment depends on the individual’s circumstances.
ImmigCanada’s Perspective
The CBSA announcement is primarily an enforcement update, rather than a change to Canada’s general permanent residence or temporary residence programs.
However, it reinforces why applicants should consider admissibility alongside program eligibility when planning their immigration strategy.
Through ImmigCanada immigration consulting services, applicants can discuss their circumstances with Eivy Joy Quito, a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC). A certified Canadian immigration consultant can help applicants understand which immigration requirements may apply to their individual circumstances.
If you have concerns about criminal inadmissibility or an immigration enforcement matter, professional advice should be based on your specific records and situation.
Check Official CBSA and IRCC Information
Immigration enforcement rules can be complex and can change over time. Readers should rely on official Canadian government sources for current requirements.
The CBSA’s September 14 announcement provides the latest figures on the extortion-related enforcement initiative.
Applicants should also review current IRCC guidance when assessing permanent residence, temporary residence or family sponsorship requirements.
The latest CBSA removals from Canada show the federal agency’s continued focus on foreign nationals who are inadmissible because of criminality, organized crime or other grounds under Canadian immigration law.
As of September 3, 2026, the CBSA reported 188 removal orders and 111 completed removals connected to the enforcement initiative. The agency also says it is currently removing approximately 400 inadmissible individuals each week.
For most immigration applicants, the practical lesson is straightforward: maintain lawful status, provide accurate information and address potential admissibility concerns early.
Frequently Asked Questions
As of September 3, 2026, CBSA reported 188 removal orders and 111 individuals removed as part of its extortion-related enforcement efforts.
The cases involve various inadmissibility grounds, including criminality, organized crime and other activities connected to extortion. CBSA prioritizes cases involving criminality and risks to public safety.
Not necessarily. Immigration consequences depend on the circumstances, the offence, applicable inadmissibility provisions and the person’s immigration status and legal situation.
Yes. Certain criminality can affect admissibility to Canada. Applicants with criminal records should assess their circumstances before submitting an immigration application.
Review the order immediately and determine whether any review, appeal or other legal process is available in your circumstances. Professional legal or immigration advice may be appropriate.